USPTO serial 78727183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ridgefield, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Migchelbrink
PAUL MIGCHELBRINK HAGEN O'CONNELL LLP121 SW MORRISON ST STE 1500PORTLAND, OR 97204-3167UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Thermal remediation machinery, equipment and parts; namely rotary desorbers, thermal oxidizers, baghouses, dust collectors, heat exchangers, scrubbers, feed bins, soil conditioners, transfer conveyors, controls, dryer shells, flights, trunnions, bin liners, ductwork, exhaust fans, dust conveyors, and bearings | ACTIVE | Nov 5, 1990 |
| 037 | Construction and environmental remediation services; namely building construction, installation of electrical systems, mechanical systems, ground water treatment systems, pump systems, above ground and underground utilities, monitoring wells, storage tanks and piping, renovation, installation and demolition of fueling facilities and systems; site development, excavation and dewatering, groundwater and soil remediation, habitat restoration, soil stabilization, erosion controls, installation of sediment caps and slurry walls, installatin of drainage systems, demolition and structure removal, storage tank removal and decommissioning, asbestos and lead abatement | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Nov 5, 1990 |
| 040 | Environmental and contamination remediation services; namely excavation, treatment, storage and disposal of contaminated soils; operation and maintenance of ground water and waste water treatment systems | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Nov 5, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |