CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BIG HAIR

USPTO serial 78727291

BIG HAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIG HAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK HARRISON

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. Box 34385Washington, DC 20045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair lotions, hair creams, hair oils, hair lacquers; hair colorants; hair waving lotionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 29, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 16, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance