USPTO serial 78727512
MCLAUGHLIN GORMLEY KING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3236117Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2007
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MCLAUGHLIN GORMLEY KING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Minneapolis, MN
McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Minneapolis, MN
McLaughlin Gormley King Company
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa D. Tambolas
Teresa D. Tambolas Valent BioSciences Corporation870 Technology WayLIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific research and development; technical research in the fields of pesticides, insecticides, insect growth regulators, and insect repellants; [ research in the field of chemistry; chemical and biological research and analysis; testing or research on pesticides, insecticides, insect growth regulators, and insect repellants; ] information on the subject of scientific research in the fields of pesticides, insecticides, insect growth regulators, and insect repellants; [ laboratory research in the field of chemistry; product research; ] product research and development; [ research and development for new products for others; ] technology consultation and research in the fields of pesticides, insecticides, insect growth regulators, and insect repellants; product development consultation; [ product development; product development for others; development and testing of chemical production methods; performance of chemical analyses; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations; product safety testing; working on and evaluation of chemical analyses; ] providing information at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global computer networks; and providing information on the subject of scientific research in the fields of chemistry and biology; providing online information in the fields of chemistry and chemical and biological research and analysis related to pesticides, insecticides, insect growth regulators, and insect repellants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 1937 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McLaughlin Gormley King Company
- Other trademarks owned by McLaughlin Gormley King Company
- Other trademarks owned by McLaughlin Gormley King Company
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MCLAUGHLIN GORMLEY KING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2018 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |