Drawing for THE CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY FOR THE UPPER AIRWAY

USPTO serial 78728396

THE CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY FOR THE UPPER AIRWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY FOR THE UPPER AIRWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gabrielle A. Holley

GABRIELLE A HOLLEY PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP11682 EL CAMINO REALSTE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical equipment for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of patients with sleep disordered breathing and comorbidities thereof, namely, nasal masks, nose and mouth masks, full face masks, nasal prongs, nasal canulae, nasal pillows, and nasal seals, mechanical ventilators, continuous positive airway pressure flow generators, bilevel flow generators, automatically titrating continuous positive airway pressure flow generators, adaptive servo ventilators, humidifiers, polysomnography equipment and parts and accessories therefor, namely masks, air cushions, mask frames, headgear assemblies, headgear clips, access port plugs, elbow assemblies, air tubing, air tubing connectors, air filter assemblies, fitting templatesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance