USPTO serial 78728750
DAISY BY DELIA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAISY BY DELIA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gallit Schuller
Gallit Schuller Law Office of Gallit Schuller140 Riverside Drive4CNew York, NY 10024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Reading glasses; Spectacle holders; Sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Belt buckles of precious metal ; Bracelets ; Brooches; Charms; Clocks; Earrings; Jewel pendants; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Necklaces; Pendants; Pins being jewelry; Rings being jewelry; Watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Jewelry boxes not of metal; Leather jewelry and accessory boxes; Picture frames ; Pillows; Wooden jewellery boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bath linen; Bath sheets; Bath towels; Bed blankets; Bed sheets; Bed skirts; Bed spreads; Blanket throws; Comforters; Crib bumpers; Curtains; Draperies ; Fabric valances; Hand towels; Mattress pads; Pillow cases; Pillow covers; Pillow shams; Pillowcases ; Quilts; Shams; Shower curtains; Towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Aprons; Athletic footwear; Baby bunting; Beach footwear; Belts; Berets; Blouses; Boots; Bow ties; Boxer briefs; Boxer shorts; Bras; Camisoles; Capes; Caps; Chemises; Children's headwear; Clogs; Coverups; Dresses; Gloves; Hats; Head wear; Headwear; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Jackets; Jeans; Jerseys; Jumpsuits; Kimonos; Leggings; Leotards and tights for women, men and children of nylon, cotton or other textile fibers; Lingerie; Loungewear; Men and women jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Mittens; Neckties; Overalls; Panties; Panties, shorts and briefs; Pants; Ponchos; Quilted vests; Rain jackets; Rainproof jackets; Sandals; Sarongs; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Skirts and dresses; Slippers; Sports shirts; Sun visors; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat shorts; Sweat suits; Swim wear; T-shirts; Tank tops; Teddies; Tennis wear; Thongs; Tops; Vests; Visors | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Belt buckles not of precious metal; Brooches; Bundle wrapping cloths; Cloth patches for clothing; Clothing hooks ; Hair bands; Hair bows; Hair buckles; Hair clips; Hair pins; Hair ribbons; Hair scrunchies; Hair wraps, bonnets and caps used as applicatiors for hair condititioners; Ribbons for gift wrapping | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Bath mats; Rugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by dELiA*s
- Other trademarks owned by dELiA*s
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named DAISY BY DELIA'S
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |