USPTO serial 78728780
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mumbai - 400 009, IN
Mumbai - 400 009, IN
Mumbai - 400 009, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Bertagnolli
Leslie Bertagnolli BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP130 E. Randolph Drive, Suite 3500One Prudential PlazaCHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Alloys of common metal, namely, bronze, brass, copper, stainless steel, steel, iron, cast iron, cast steel, nickel, nickel silver, tin, titanium, white metal, steel and zinc and its alloys all unwrought or semi-wrought; latch bars of metal; various types of bolts of metal, namely, flat and lock bolts, flush and surface bolts; furniture fittings made of nickel-silver, bronze, brass, stainless steel, copper and its alloys, namely, cabinets knobs and pulls, cabinet handles, cabinet hinges, cabinet surface and mortise locks; door bolts, door fittings, namely, hinges, door knobs, door surface and mortise locks, door lever handles, clavos, studs, hinge straps, strap hinges, corner brackets, door push plates, door stops, door handles all of metal; non-electric metal door bells; metal door knockers; ferrules of metal for handles; fittings of metal for windows and buildings, namely, window fasteners, window handles, window stays, sash locks and pulls; floor tiles, wall tiles, all of metal; metal hardware hooks for clothes and clothes rails; letter boxes and non-luminous house numbers of metal; ironmongery, and ironwork for furniture, doors and windows, namely, cabinets knobs, cabinet handles, cabinet hinges, cabinet surface and mortise locks, door bolts, door fittings, namely, hinges, door knobs, door lever handles, door surface and mortise locks, clavos, studs, hinge straps, strap hinges, corner brackets, door knockers, door handles, door push plates, door stops, non-electric door bells, window fasteners, window stays, window handles, sash locks and pulls; metal key blanks; small hardware of metal, namely, knobs, latches, door stops, namely, stops for doors and windows, metal hinges, namely, strap hinges, cabinet hinges, mortise door hinges, surface mounted door hinges, paumelle hinges, spring hinges, metal hardware, namely, nuts and screws, fixed towel dispensers of metal; non-electric locks, namely, locks of metal, namely, padlocks, spring locks, surface locks, mortise locks; house letters and numerals of metal; tiles of metal for building, namely, wall and floor tiles; metal casement bolts, sash fasteners, all for windows; all of the above mentioned made of non-precious metal; metal bars for metal railings; metal bells, works of art, namely, bronze statues, all of metal; grilles, all of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |