USPTO serial 78728834
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All purpose sport bags; All-purpose athletic bags; All-purpose carrying bags; Animal carriers; Athletic bags; Attache cases; Backpacks; Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Bags for umbrellas; Billfolds; Briefcase-type portfolios; Briefcases; Business card cases; Business cases; Calling card cases; Carry-all bags; Carry-on bags; Carryalls; Carrying cases; Carrying cases for documents; Change purses; Coin purses; Credit card cases; Garment bags for travel; Golf umbrellas; Handbags; Key bags; Key case; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather briefcases; Leather cases; Leather cases for keys; Leather handbags; Leather purses; Luggage; Luggage tags; Overnight bags; Overnight cases; Parasols; Parasols ; Purses; Shoulder bags; Suitcases; Telescopic umbrellas; Tote bags; Travel bags; Travelling bags (leather ware); Trunks ; Umbrella covers; Umbrellas; Wallets; Wine totes with handles for carrying or holding wine | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 024 | Afghans; Bed blankets; Bed linen; Bed sheets; Bed skirts; Bed spreads; Blanket throws; Blankets for outdoor use; Comforters; Cotton fabric; Fabrics for the manufacture of apparel; Textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing; Textile linings for garments; Textile used as lining for clothing; Throws | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 025 | Blouses; Bottoms; Coats; Dresses; Ear muffs; Hats; Jackets; Neckwear; Overcoats; Robes; Scarves; Shirts; Sweaters; Tops ; Trousers | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |