USPTO serial 78729281
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Pitcher and Alexander H. Butterman
David M. Pitcher and Alexander H. Butterman STAAS & HALSEY LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE N.W.7th FloorWASHINGTON, DC 20005-6129| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVISORY SERVICES FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; DATA PROCESSING SERVICES USING COMPUTERS; OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATIONS BY COMPUTER TERMINALS; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND IMAGES; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; AND PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; computer software design for others; installation and setup of computer software for others; maintenance and updating of computer software for others; remote controlling and supervising of computer systems and networks, namely, monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing backup computer programs and facilities; technical support in the nature of monitoring the network systems of others; monitoring, testing, analyzing and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the web sites of others; monitoring the web sites of others to improve scalability and performance of others' web sites; computer systems analysis; consulting in the field of computer hardware and software; providing information regarding design, development and maintenance of computer software; rental and leasing of computers, servers and computer software; computer database leasing, namely, rental of database servers to third parties, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable database of information and data; data processing services using computers, namely development of data processing programs by order of third parties; product research and development for others in the field of computer hardware and software, communication systems and semiconductor devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |