Drawing for ENS

USPTO serial 78729462

ENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry; Bracelets; Costume jewelry; Identification bracelets; Jewel chains; Jewel pendants; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry caskets of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, crosses; Lapel pins; Pearls; Pins being jewelry; Precious metals and their alloys; Precious metals; Precious stones; Rings being jewelry; Semi-wrought precious stones and their imitations; Unwrought and semi-wrought precious stones and their imitations; Unwrought precious stonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2006RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Apr 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance