USPTO serial 78729492
BIOVITALIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOVITALIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cable television converters; Car navigation computers; Car televisions; Communications computers; Computer application software for mobile phones; Computer central processing units; Computer keyboards; Computer keypads; Computer monitor frames; Computer monitors; Computer mouse; Desktop computers; Digital cellular phones; Digital phones; Ear phones; Electronic and optical communications instruments and components, namely, cable television transmitters; Electronic computers; Handheld computers; Handheld personal computers; Internet phones; Laptop computers; Microwave ovens for laboratory use; Mobile computers; Notebook computers; Personal computers; Radio and television aerials; Receivers for receiving cable television; Telematics apparatus, namely, wireless Internet devices which provide telematic services and have a cellular phone function; Television antennas; Television monitors; Television receivers ; Television sets; Television transmitters; Video phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Baking ovens; Convection ovens; Cook-and hold-ovens; Domestic cooking ovens; Electric cooking ovens; Electric toaster ovens; Gas cooking ovens; Microwave ovens; Microwave ovens for cooking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | RGRN | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REISSUE NOA | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |