USPTO serial 78729851
SF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Kevlin, Esq.
MARY L KEVLIN ESQ COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, RADIOS; PRE-RECORDED VIDEOTAPES RELATING TO BASEBALL, PRE-RECORDED VIDEODISCS RELATING TO BASEBALL; PRE-RECORDED AUDIO DISCS RELATING TO BASEBALL; EYEGLASS CASES, CELL PHONES, BINOCULARS; ELECTRIC SWITCH PLATE COVERS; LUMINOUS SIGNS, NEON SIGNS; COMPUTER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, WRIST PADS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SCREEN SAVERS, AND COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS DOWNLOADABLE FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF BASEBALL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |