USPTO serial 78730037
THERAFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROTH, JASON I
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THERAFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall S. Polcyn
NATALIE A. REMIEN BELL, BOYD & LLOYD, LLPP.O. BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements not related to the processing of blood or blood components; nutritional supplements not related to the processing of blood or blood components | ABANDONED | Oct 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |