USPTO serial 78730068
MEDI CAPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDI CAPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven T. Shelton
STEVEN T SHELTON CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP31 W 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10019-6131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, INSURANCE UNDERWRITING SERVICES; ACTUARIAL SERVICES; REAL ESTATE SERVICES, NAMELY, VALUATIONS AND FINANCIAL APPRAISALS OF REAL ESTATE; REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES; RENTAL, LETTING, AND LEASE OF REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES; REAL ESTATE AGENCY SERVICES; BANKING SERVICES; ESTATE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES; TRUSTEE SERVICES, NAMELY, REAL ESTATE TRUSTEE SERVICES, PERSONAL PROPERTY TRUSTEE SERVICES, INTANGIBLE PROPERTY TRUSTEE SERVICES; CHARITABLE FUND RAISING SERVICES; MUTUAL FUNDS SERVICES, NAMELY, MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MUTUAL FUND DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, MUTUAL FUND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, SPONSORING MUTUAL FUNDS, PROVIDING ADMINISTRATION AND SHAREHOLDER SERVICES TO MUTUAL FUNDS; CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES; FACTORING AGENCIES; INVOICE DISCOUNTING SERVICES; CASH DISPENSING SERVICES, NAMELY, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE SERVICES; LEASE PURCHASE FINANCING SERVICES; HIRE PURCHASE FINANCING SERVICES; FINANCIAL CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, CREDIT CARD, CHARGE CARD, CASH CARD, CHECK GUARANTEE CARD, DEBIT CARD SERVICES; RENTAL, HIRE AND LEASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR PROCESSING FINANCIAL CARDS AND DATA RELATING THERETO; FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE SERVICES; MERCHANT BANKING AND INVESTMENT BANKING SERVICES; BANKING SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT ACCOUNT AND SAVINGS ACCOUNT SERVICES; FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES; STOCK BROKERAGE SERVICES; UNIT INVESTMENT TRUSTS; FINANCIAL PLANNING AND INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES; FINANCIAL RESEARCH SERVICES; PENSION FUND SERVICES, NAMELY, ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE PENSION PLANS; PROVISION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION; ADMINISTRATION AND VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS; SAFE CUSTODY SERVICES, NAMELY, SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX SERVICES; FINANCIAL SPONSORSHIP OF SPORTING, CHARITABLE, AND EDUCATIONAL EVENTS; PROVIDING CONSULTANCY, INFORMATION AND ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |