USPTO serial 78730180
UB ULTIMATEBET.COM WHERE VIRTUALLY EVERYONE PLAYS POKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3784834Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 4, 2010
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UB ULTIMATEBET.COM WHERE VIRTUALLY EVERYONE PLAYS POKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Jolley
JENNIFER L. JOLLEY Jolley IP Law1001 Fourth Ave, Ste 4400Seattle, WA 98154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and computer software downloadable from a computer network for use in the provision of entertainment services, namely, on-line computer games, on-line card games, on-line roulette games and on-line casino games; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines and bulletins concerning on-line computer games, on-line card games, on-line roulette games and on-line casino games and featuring information in the field of on-line computer games, on-line card games, on-line roulette games and on-line casino games via a computer network; communication servers; computer hardware; interactive computer systems comprised of servers, network hardware and software all for accessing and playing on-line computer games, on-line card games, on-line roulette games and on-line casino games; downloadable interactive software provided over a computer network for accessing gaming, amusement and entertainment services; slot machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, coats, jackets, jerseys, jumpers, overcoats, pants, shirts, tee-shirts, trousers, underwear, shawls, scarfs, neckties, ties; footwear, namely, shoes, boots; headgear, namely, hats all of the aforementioned goods being marketed and sold only in connection with the promotion of a business that provides entertainment services in the nature of poker games and tournaments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Games, namely, card games, board games, roulette wheels and table top roulette games; hand held units for playing casino games; coin-operated amusement machines and video games; playing cards; card games; dice and dice games; roulette games; lottery games, namely, scratch off lottery cards and lottery tickets, bingo game playing equipment, keno cards; gaming equipment, namely, roulette and casino chips; darts, electronic dart games and dart boards; articles and apparatus for playing pool and snooker, namely, cues and tables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Organising exhibitions for sporting or entertainment purposes; casinos; gaming services, namely, conducting gaming contests and tournaments; organising competitions in the field of gaming; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Agency services, namely, organising exhibitions in the field of poker and gaming competitions, providing casinos, conducting gaming contests and tournaments, organising gaming competitions, and providing on-line computer games, all for others; provision of the aforesaid services on-line from a computer database or the Internet; provision of information in the field of gambling services accessible via a global computer network; provision of information on line from a computer database or from the Internet in the field of sports, gaming, and entertainment; providing lottery games, bingo games, keno games and Rochambeau games, all via a computer network; providing information in the field of on-line computer games, on-line card games, on-line roulette games and on-line casino games via a computer network; electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, magazines and bulletins provided by electronic mail concerning on-line computer games, on-line card games, on-line roulette games and on-line casino games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Game Theory Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Game Theory Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Game Theory Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named UB ULTIMATEBET.COM WHERE VIRTUALLY EVERYONE PLAYS POKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 4, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 4, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |