USPTO serial 78730822
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kiersten Skog
KIERSTEN SKOG C/O ANTHONY ORTIZ 1515 BROADWAY 51ST FLVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of an on-going television series, featuring live action, comedy and drama; providing online information in the field of entertainment concerning television programs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |