Drawing for AQUASPACE

USPTO serial 78730849

AQUASPACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AQUASPACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK HARRISON

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Aroma chemicals, namely, chemical preparations for use in the manufacture of fragrances, fragrance ingredients and fragrance compounds; chemicals for use in the formulation of fragrances; chemicals for use in the manufacture of perfumes and perfumed products; chemicals for use in the manufacture of cosmetic and toilet preparations; chemicals for use in the manufacture of air-freshening and deodorizing preparations; chemicals for use as fragrances and flavors for use in the manufacture of oral care preparations; chemicals for use as fragrances for impregnation in textiles; chemicals for use as fragrances in the manufacture of house-hold cleansers, deodorizers and disinfectants; chemicals for use as fragrances and flavorings for foods and beveragesABANDONED—
003Perfumes and essential oils; cosmetics; deodorants and antiperspirant preparations; perfumed soaps; bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; detergents for household use, namely, dish detergent, detergent soap; laundry preparations, namely, laundry detergent, laundry bleach, laundry soap; depilatories and depilatory preparations and substances; ethereal essences and oils for personal use; beverage flavorings prepared from essential oils; hair care preparations; lipsticks, hand and body creams and lotions; make-up removing preparations; mascara; beauty masks; cleansing preparations for personal use, namely, cosmetic soap, skin soap, deodorant soap, facial washes; nail care preparations; nail care substances, namely, nail cream, nail polish; cosmetic pencils; exfoliant preparations for personal use; shaving preparations; pre-soaking preparations for laundry use; stain removersABANDONED—
042Chemical laboratories and laboratory research in the field of organic and inorganic materials, namely, services to sampling the smells, flavor and odors of organic and inorganic materialsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 26, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 26, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2007OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2007NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
May 16, 2007NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance