USPTO serial 78731215
THE SHAMROCK OF LOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3851729Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2010
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SHAMROCK OF LOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nikki Siesel
Nikki Siesel Law Offices of Joseph C. Messina424 Mamaroneck AvenueMamaroneck, NY 10543UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, medallions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 21, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Irish American Shamrock Garden Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Irish American Shamrock Garden Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by SHAMROCK OF LOVE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SHAMROCK OF LOVE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named THE SHAMROCK OF LOVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |