USPTO serial 78731624
GSI GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GSI GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine parts, namely air bearings, spindles, and parts and fittings thereof; house mark for lasers, laser systems, and parts, subsystems, components, and accessories therefore used in machines; equipment for the production of semiconductors, namely, ion beam sputter (IBS) etching and deposition machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | lasers not for medical use; power supplies, controls and parts therefore; lasers for use in the automotive, semiconductor, electronic manufacturing and industrial manufacturing industries; laser scanners and radiation beam scanners for use in the automotive, semiconductor, electronic manufacturing and industrial manufacturing industries; lasers and parts therefore for cutting, drilling, engraving, welding, marking, manufacturing, repairing, coding, trimming, inspecting, machining processing materials or electronic components in the medical, automotive, semiconductor, electronic manufacturing and industrial manufacturing industries; Laser-scanners for inspecting two and three dimensional objects for computer-chip repair and processing; optical components, namely, lenses, prisms, filters, optical fibers and waveguide reflectors; fiber optic conduits for scientific and industrial applications; laboratory robots for handling wafers; voltage and current meters; galvanometers; servo controllers; galvanometer scanners; resonant scanners; angular and linear position detectors, namely, optical or capacitive position detectors; computer controlled printer/decorator comprised of a thermal printer head, micro-controllers, stepper motors, electric heater and DC power supply to apply digital images to various substrates; electrical controllers, computer hardware and software for use in operating lasers and machines having lasers; alignment pattern recognition and assembly tools comprising a computer; software for converting gray scale scanned images to patterns that simulate halftones; computer software for acquiring, analyzing and disseminating image data from a camera; laser and thermal printers, electronic thermal chart recorders; software for laser based systems for industrial manufacturing in the field of electronic circuits and radio frequency components; computer hardware, namely, an integrated circuit card for use in providing connections between a computer, laser scanner and control unit and parts thereof; machine vision systems namely visual inspection component used to identify laser mark content and wafer alignment that comprise general and special purpose processors, storage media, input/output devices, image sensors, computer programs and instruction manuals; replaceable laser module for laser marker; computer based optical reader; optical scan heads for beam-positioning; interferometric encoders and positioners for measuring, motion control and positioning used in manufacturing, machinery and metrology; optical, electrical, optical, electrical, and scientific apparatus, namely, optical transceivers; scientific and technical apparatus, namely, super polished optical mirrors; super-polished optical windows for use in optical sub-assemblies, super-polished substrates, polished to better than one angstrom RMS used in optical sub-assemblies; beam-splitters optical apparatus, namely, polarizing beam splitters, machine glass components, namely optics for guiding or directing light using glass and/or ceramic substrates | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | lasers for use in the medical industry; position encoders, scanners and radiation beam scanners for use in the medical industry; medical image recorders; image scanners for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | marking for wafers, circuit boards and metal parts; printed circuit board laser processing used for trimming circuit boards; electronic component laser trimming used for resistor and capacitor trimming | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | laser welding, cutting, localized laser heat treating, custom design and manufacture of radiation beam scanning devices and radiation beam scanning systems; custom manufacture of optical and electronic systems relating to generating and controlling a radiation beam; printed circuit board laser processing used for cutting circuit boards; custom design and manufacture of lasers and optical systems and controls therefore for use in the telecommunications, electronics, medical, aerospace, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GSI Group Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by GSI Group Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named GSI GROUP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |