Drawing for SUDOKU GOLD

USPTO serial 78731872

SUDOKU GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUDOKU GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil M. Batavia

Neil M. Batavia Dority & Manning, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Disposable ticket sets for playing games of chance, namely, scratch-off lottery game tickets; lottery game materials, namely, lottery tickets and cards; and promotional game materials, namely, promotional game cardsACTIVE—
041Electronic game services, namely, online lottery and promotional games services provided by means of the Internet; entertainment services available through the Internet, namely, providing on-line computer gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 9, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 3, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 3, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance