USPTO serial 78732143
CAIRTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAIRTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Steamboat Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn J. Fairless
CAROLYN J FAIRLESS WHEELER TRIGG KENNEDY LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 3600DENVER, CO 80202-2617UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROCUREMENT, NAMELY, PURCHASING A COMPLETE FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE FOR USE WITH COAL FIRED BOILERS FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING START-UP SUPPORT FOR BUSINESSES OF OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF A COMPLETE FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE FOR USE WITH COAL FIRED BOILERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION OF A COMPLETE FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE FOR USE WITH COAL FIRED BOILERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING FOR A COMPLETE FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION TECHNOLOGY PACKAGE FOR USE WITH COAL FIRED BOILERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |