Drawing for MIPILLOW

USPTO serial 78732315

MIPILLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIPILLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio speakers, remote controls for audio speakers embedded in pillowsACTIVE—
020Bed pillows, decorative pillows, electronic interactive pillows featuring audio speakers and remote controls for audio speakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 29, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 27, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 16, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 16, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 15, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jun 26, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance