USPTO serial 78732910
DISCOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISCOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul C. Remus
Paul C. Remus Devine Millimet & Branch PA111 AMHERST STMANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | research services for others, namely, basic and applied research in the fields of business and economics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research services for others, namely, basic and applied research in the fields of applied and pure science, social science, humanities, the arts, engineering, health, and the life sciences; research services for others, namely, basic and applied research in the medical fields of mental health, occupational therapy, physical therapy, kinesthetic body movement, and nursing care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University of New Hampshire
- Other trademarks owned by University of New Hampshire
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DISCOVERY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |