Drawing for ASSIGNMENT TRACKER

USPTO serial 78733128

ASSIGNMENT TRACKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSIGNMENT TRACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD S. ROBERTS

RICHARD S ROBERTS ROBERTS & ROBERTS, LLP, ATTORNEYS AT LAWPO BOX 484PRINCETON, NJ 08542-0484UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009HAND HELD ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS HAVING A TIME AND DATE SCHEDULING FUNCTION NAMELY, PERSONAL INFORMATION MANAGER ORGANIZERS, CALCULATORS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, SPELLERS, THESAURUSES, DICTIONARIES, AND LANGUAGE TRANSLATORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 18, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 18, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 1, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 7, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance