USPTO serial 78733255
MARIE CLAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARIE CLAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92130 Issy Les Moulineaux, FR
92130 Issy Les Moulineaux, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, marmalade, compote; eggs, milk and other dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and edible fats; butter; preserved truffles, olives; pickles; olives preserved; cheese; crystallized fruits; foie gras; preparations for making soup; crustaceans not live, namely shrimp, lobster and crab; preserved meats, and fish; dried vegetables; dishes and ready-made food, namely, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; caviar; vegetable juice for cooking | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; coffee substitutes; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, processed cereals, wafers and biscuits; chocolate, corn, flour-based chips; cereal products, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal-based snack food, processed cereals, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars; bread; biscuits; cakes; pastries; and confectionery chips for baking; flavored ices; honey; treacle; yeast; baking-powder; salt; mustard; pepper; vinegar; sauces; tomato sauces; spices; pasta; mayonnaise; chocolate; chocolate-based beverages, namely chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; condiments, namely pepper sauce, relish; golden syrup, namely corn syrup, maple syrup, molasses syrup; sandwiches; pizzas; pancakes; food starch; cookies; rusks; candy for food; edible decorations for cakes; essences for foodstuffs, except ethereal essences and essential oils, namely food flavorings; infusions not medicinal, namely herbal infusions; meat gravies; soy, chili, artichoke, barbeque, cheese sauce; almond, chocolate paste for cakes; salad dressing; and garden herbs preserved | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Agricultural grains for planting; bulbs, seeds for horticultural purposes; and unprocessed grains; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, namely, grass, fruit, flower, crop, bird and wheat seeds; flowers; fresh olives; malt for brewing and distilling; garden herbs fresh; fresh citrus fruit | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beer, ale and porter; mineral waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely non-alcoholic beer, punch, and soda pop; fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups for beverages; and other preparations for making fruit drinks; lemonade; fruit nectar; soda water; aperitif non alcoholic | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; bar services; catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marie Claire Album
- Other trademarks owned by Marie Claire Album
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MARIE CLAIRE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |