USPTO serial 78733461
MAGNIFISCENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGNIFISCENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Rosa Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry Zerner
LARRY ZERNER LAW OFFICE OF LARRY ZERNER1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After-shave lotions; Aromatherapy lotions; Aromatherapy pillows comprising potpourri in fabric containers; Automatic dishwashing detergents; Baby lotion; Baby oils; Baby powders; Baby shampoo; Baby wipes; Bath oils; Bath salts ; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Bathing lotions; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty masks; Beauty serums; Body lotions; Body powder; Body scrub; Cleaning preparations for household purposes; Cleaning solutions for dental ultrasonic sterilization apparatus; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cuticle conditioners; Denture cleaning preparations; Deodorants and antiperspirants; Deodorants for clothing or textiles; Dishwashing detergents; Disinfectant soaps; Essential oils for personal use; Exfoliants for skin; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Facial creams; Foot deodorant spray; Foot powder ; Hair conditioners; Household cleaning preparations; Laundry detergent; Lip cream; Massage oils; Non-medicated bath preparations; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse; Perfuming sachets; Potpourri; Sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; Sachets; Scented body spray; Scented linen sprays; Shampoos; Shampoos for babies; Shaving lotions; Sunscreen creams | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2004 |
| 005 | Anti-insect spray; Antibacterial spray; Car deodorant; Cedar wood for use as an insect repellent; Eye pillows containing aromatic substances for relief from headaches, insomnia and sinus discomfort; Herbal products, namely, aroma therapy packs containing herbs used for aroma therapy; Repellents for insects; Room deodorants; Sinus pillows containing aromatic substances for relief from headaches, insomnia and sinus discomfort | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |