USPTO serial 78733617
MOLNARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOLNARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott L. Maddox
Scott L. Maddox The Law Office of Arthur M. Dula3106 BeauchampHouston, TX 77009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Aircraft; Amphibious vehicles; Land vehicles; Land vehicles and structural parts therefor; Marine vehicles, namely, run-abouts; Personal watercraft, namely, small power boats, personal jet boats, water scooters | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Bracelets; Costume jewelry; Identification bracelets; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes of precious metal; Jewelry cases of precious metal; Jewelry chains; Jewelry findings; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry watches; Lapel pins; Pins being jewelry; Rings being jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts; Bibs not of cloth or paper; Caps; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Cloth bibs; Denims; Hat bands; Hats; Headgear, namely, hats, caps; Heavy jackets; Hoods; Jackets; Jerseys; Jogging pants; Leather belts; Leather jackets; Leather shoes; Light-reflecting jackets; Long jackets; Men and women jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Pants; Rubber shoes; Shifts; Shoes; Short sets; Shoulder wraps; Ski pants; Snow pants; Sweat pants; Tennis shoes; Ties; Tops; Track pants; Waterproof jackets and pants; Wraps | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Athletic sporting goods, namely, athletic wrist and joint supports; Bags specially adapted for sports equipment; Bathtub toys; Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Boards used in the practice of water sports; Cases for toy vehicles; Collectable toy figures; Electric action toys; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Mechanical toys; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Plush toys; Push toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Sport balls; Sporting goods and equipment for speed training, namely, rings, cones, speed ladders, coaching sticks, training arches, ankle bands, resistance chutes, hurdles; Toy airplanes; Toy model cars; Toy model hobbycraft kits; Toy model kit cars; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy vehicles; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Molnari, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Molnari, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MOLNARI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |