Drawing for THE CONSPIRACY

USPTO serial 78733712

THE CONSPIRACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CONSPIRACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry Oliver Chase

BARRY OLIVER CHASE LAW OFFICE OF BARRY OLIVER CHASE PA21 SE 1ST AVE STE 700MIAMI, FL 33131-1025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio recordings featuring music and sounds; Bullet-proof vests and clothing; Downloadable musical sound recordings; Downloadable video recordings featuring music and sounds and images; Musical sound recordings; Musical video recordings; Phonograph record sleeves; Phonograph records featuring music and sounds; Plastic and cardboard cases for storing record albums; Pre-recorded CD's, video tapes, laser disks and DVD's featuring music and sounds; Sound recording apparatus; Sound recordings featuring music and sounds; Video recordings featuring music and sounds and images; Visual recordings and audio visual recordings featuring music and animationACTIVE—
025Belts; Caps; Cloth bibs; Clothing, namely, wrap-arounds; Dusters; Hoods; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Jerseys; Leather belts; Mantles; Mufflers; Shifts; Short sets; Ties; Tops; WrapsACTIVE—
041Arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events; Booking of entertainment halls; Entertainment in the nature of beauty pageants; Entertainment in the nature of dance performances; Entertainment in the nature of fashion shows; Entertainment in the nature of laser shows; Entertainment in the nature of light shows; Entertainment in the nature of live performances by musical groups; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of music; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; Entertainment namely, live performances by a musical band; Entertainment namely, production of television and film; Entertainment services namely live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting of competitions for musical groups; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a musical celebrity; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Entertainment, namely a continuing television show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment, namely live music concerts; Entertainment, namely live performances by musical bands; Entertainment, namely, live performances by rock groups; Radio entertainment productionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 23, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance