USPTO serial 78734034
I INTEVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I INTEVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SANTA CLARA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY Z COLE
STANLEY Z COLE STANLEY Z COLE, ATTORNEY AT LAW26620 ST FRANCIS RD # 2LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022-2004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Thin film deposition and handling equipment for making memory disks and for making semiconductors, including sputtering equipment, etching equipment, temperature control equipment, carbon coating equipment, plasma deposition equipment, disk handling equipment and lubricating equipment, including machines for the manufacture of magnetic disks for computer applications and for the manufacture of flat panels for displays | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2004 |
| 009 | Electronic components; diodes; photodiodes; photocathodes; photodetectors; testing and measuement apparatus; photonics, namely cameras, lasers, packaged electronic chips and video display monitors for creating and displaying images, including images at low light levels; vacuum generating chambers; vacuum generating equipment; and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |