USPTO serial 78734243
CERTITECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERTITECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Overland Park, KS
Overland Park, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wade Kerrigan
WADE KERRIGAN BLACKWELL SANDERS PEPER MARTIN LLP4801 MAIN ST STE 1000KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-2551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Centrally operated vacuum cleaner systems, comprising a central vacuum power unit, connecting conduits, cleaning nozzles, low voltage electrical switch components and parts therefore, namely, handles, hoses, wands, brushes, powerheads, and vacuum inlets | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Fire detection, monitoring and alarm systems and accompanying accessories, namely, network systems, multiplex systems, stand alone systems, voice communication systems and fire alarm emergency phone systems, comprising, graphical command centers, manual stations, smoke detectors and sensors, flame detectors, heat detectors and sensors, water flow switches, sprinkler supervisory switches, door holders and/or closures, modems, fiber optic line drivers, alarm communicator transmitters and receivers, remote station receivers, audible and visible notification appliances, annunciators, intercoms, CRT monitors and printers, batteries and charges and transient suppressors; Telephone systems, comprised of a handset and console unit with console features, namely, standard telephone functions, one-touch dialing, call progress monitoring, group listening, clock/calendar and alarm, electronic display, and modules for features, namely, automatic dialing, call restriction, stored message recall, and custom calling; communicating apparatuses, namely, facsimile apparatus and telephones with two way video transmitters; stereo systems comprising stereo amplifiers, stereo cables, stereo receivers, stereo tuners, and remote controls for stereos; audio distribution systems comprising line level stereo distribution consoles, stereo cables; audio infrared systems comprising remote controls for stereos, infrared distribution consoles, repeaters, RF distribution consoles; audio RF systems comprising remote controls for stereos, RF tuning devices, namely resonators; Audio products, namely, radio receivers, tape recorders, tape players, CD players, CD recorders, television receiving sets, video tape players, video tape recorders, DVD players, DVD recorders; display systems for DVD, compact discs, mini-discs and digital discs consisting of multimedia projectors and projection screens; audio equipment, namely, speakers, speaker wires, woofers, sub-woofers, tweeters, mid-range drivers and cross-over networks in the form of an electrical frequency dividing circuitry therefore; Low voltage electrical wire, namely solid core, braided, stranded, twisted pair; Ethernet, fiber optic, coaxial, termination modules; decorative switch plate covers, namely, telephone plates, data plates, coax plates, speaker plates, interface plates | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |