Drawing for BEYOND BORDERS, A HOLLY HUNT COLLECTION

USPTO serial 78734395

BEYOND BORDERS, A HOLLY HUNT COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEYOND BORDERS, A HOLLY HUNT COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027rugs and carpetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 30, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 30, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 24, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance