Drawing for POS-GRIP TECHNOLOGY WWW.POSGRIP.COM

USPTO serial 78736917

POS-GRIP TECHNOLOGY WWW.POSGRIP.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POS-GRIP TECHNOLOGY WWW.POSGRIP.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Bourque

Daniel J. Bourque BOURQUE AND ASSOCIATES835 HANOVER STMANCHESTER, NH 03104-5401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal goods for use in drilling and completing oil and gas wells and in the production of oil and gas from wells, namely manually operated valves, risers, riser connectors, pipeline connectors, jumper connectors, metal to metal seals, high pressure seals, geothermal wellheads, subsea connectors and wellhead connectorsACTIVE—
007Metal goods for use in drilling and completing oil and gas wells and in the production of oil and gas from wells, namely, wellheads, Christmas trees and valves, namely, wellhead valves, Christmas tree valves, and mechanically operated valvesACTIVE—
037construction, installation and maintenance services relating to oil and gas well structuresACTIVE—
042design services for others relating to oil and gas well structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance