Drawing for SQUEAKY DUCK

USPTO serial 78739934

SQUEAKY DUCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQUEAKY DUCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aletta Dekkers

ALETTA DEKKERS OFFICE OF ALETTA DEKKERS STONEY CREEK; ONC ONTARIOL8J 2X4950 RIDGE RD,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012shopping cart seat covers namely infant and toddler seat protectors for shopping carts made of textile; car seat covers, made of textile; baby carriage and stroller covers namely infant and toddler seat protectors made of textileACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 6, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 6, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 21, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance