USPTO serial 78752199
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alpa V. Patel, Esq.
Alpa V. Patel, Esq. Hiscock & Barclay, LLP2000 HSBC Plaza100 Chestnut StreetRochester, NY 14604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bedding linens, namely, pillow cases and bed sheets | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |