Drawing for GREENLAND

USPTO serial 78753208

GREENLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GREENLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Kenney

ROBERT J KENNEYPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits; fresh vegetables, namely artichokes, asparagus, beans, beets, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, cabbage, carrots, cauliflower, celery, Chinese cabbage, chicory, endives, escarole, cucumbers, corn, eggplants, fennel, garlic, kale, leeks, lettuce, mushrooms, okra, onions, parsley, parsnips, peppers, potatoes, radishes, rhubarb, rutabagas, shallots, spinach, sweet potatoes, tomatoes., turnips, yams, and watercress; live plants, namely, tomato plants; natural flowersACTIVEApr 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2008MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Feb 22, 2008ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 26, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 17, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance