USPTO serial 78758428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Kevlin
Mary L. Kevlin COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, radios; pre-recorded videotapes relating to baseball, pre-recorded audio discs relating to baseball; compact disc cases; eyeglass cases, cases for personal digital assistants, cell phones, cell phone accessories, namely, cases and face plate covers; binoculars; calculators; photographic cameras; electric switch plate covers; luminous signs, neon signs; sunglasses; protective helmets, baseball batting helmets, catcher's helmets; video and video game controllers; computer accessories, namely, wrist pads, computer software, namely, screen savers, and computer game programs downloadable from a global computer network in the field of baseball, all relating to or promoting the sport of baseball | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |