Drawing for ALL-STAR GAME

USPTO serial 78758428

ALL-STAR GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL-STAR GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin

Mary L. Kevlin COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, radios; pre-recorded videotapes relating to baseball, pre-recorded audio discs relating to baseball; compact disc cases; eyeglass cases, cases for personal digital assistants, cell phones, cell phone accessories, namely, cases and face plate covers; binoculars; calculators; photographic cameras; electric switch plate covers; luminous signs, neon signs; sunglasses; protective helmets, baseball batting helmets, catcher's helmets; video and video game controllers; computer accessories, namely, wrist pads, computer software, namely, screen savers, and computer game programs downloadable from a global computer network in the field of baseball, all relating to or promoting the sport of baseballACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 27, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 14, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 6, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 7, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance