USPTO serial 78760453
LIVI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas N. Masters, Sharon A. Ceresnie, Rupen Fofaria, Daniel D. Frohling, J. Manuel Herrera, Nathan J. Hole, Mary E. Innis, Nerissa C. McGinn, Seth A. Rose, Julie P. Samuels
DOUGLAS N. MASTERS LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N. CLARK ST., SUITE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60654UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby oil, baby powder, baby shampoo, body cream, body oil, body powder, bubble bath, skin, body and face cleansing lotions, all purpose cleaning preparations, disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene and for houshold use, shampoo, shave gel, shave cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin cleansing cream, soap, skin toners, skin lotion, skin moisturizer, skin clarifiers, liquid soap | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Air fresheners | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Baby bottle nipples, baby bottles, electric and non-electric massage apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting fixtures, electrical lamps and lamps, dispensing units for air fresheners, electric heaters for baby bottles, shower heads, facial saunas | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Brooms, brushes for cleaning, cleaning cloths, cleaning pads, scrubbing brushes, soap dispensers, sponges for bathing, applying makeup and for household cleaning, squeegees for household use, body scrubbing puffs, plastic drinking glasses, vases and candle holders not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Baby toys, namely, bath toys, bathtub toys, battery operated action toys, crib toys, electronic toy building blocks that light up as a night light, inflatable bath toys, inflatable toys, sandbox toys, soft sculpture plush toys, soft sculpture toys, stuffed toy animals, stuffed toys, toy banks, toy boxes, toy building blocks, toy figures, toy houses, toy masks, toy mobiles, toy music boxes, toy prism glasses, toy scooters, toy snow globes, toy stamps, toy water globes, toy wind socks, toys designed to be attached to car seats, strollers, cribs, and high chairs, water squirting toys, wind-up toys, baby multiple activity toys and baby rattles | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail candy, jewelry, furniture, apparel, gift and department store services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Luxi, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Luxi, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LIVI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |