Drawing for VERTICAL DRAG RACING

USPTO serial 78766033

VERTICAL DRAG RACING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERTICAL DRAG RACING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah A. Peacock

MICHAEL R DANGELO ROCKET RACING INCPO BOX 38NEWBURYPORT, MA 01950-0038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012rocket-powered aircraft and spacecraftACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 30, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 30, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 31, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 31, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance