CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PONCHE KUBA

USPTO serial 78772559

PONCHE KUBA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PONCHE KUBA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely rums and rum liqueursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 22, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 14, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance