USPTO serial 78774952
XACTDATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XACTDATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JERSEY CITY, NJ
JERSEY CITY, NJ
JERSEY CITY, NJ
Orem, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Smith
Robert W. Smith McCarter & English, LLP100 Mulberry StreetFour Gateway CenterNewark, NJ 07102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for estimating and valuing insuring, remodeling, replacement and construction costs and for managing the insured's home contents and instructional materials sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Data compiling and analyzing in the field of insurance | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing a database for tracking, monitoring, and generating reports on information and statistics about the progress of insurance claims from the beginning of the claim until payment or settlement of the claim, including property valuations, remodeling costs and repair estimates | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electronic storage services, namely storing data on insurance claims that involve damages to real property, home warranties, valuations of real estate and buildings, and insurance policies covering real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for tracking and documenting insurance claims and valuations of real estate and buildings, for estimating the costs of insurance, construction, remodeling or replacement of residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural buildings, for calculating the costs of repairs, for monitoring of claims under home warranties and building insurance policies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ISO INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Xactware, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XACTDATA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |