USPTO serial 78774999
X T MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with X T MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Merchant & Gould P.C.
MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; preparations for personal hygiene and beauty care, namely cold creams,skin creams and moisturizers, bath gels, body oil, hair shampoo and conditioners,skin soap, personal deodorants; cosmetic sun-tanning preparations, self-tanning suntan lotions, non-self tanning skin care lotions, all for use in natural sun and in solariums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |