USPTO serial 78807611
NTH SERVICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NTH SERVICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki, Esq.
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI ESQ C/O TRADEMARK DOCKET CLERK, 600 PEACHTRETROUTMAN SANDERS LLPSTE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, namely, laser hair removal, laser vein removal, sclerotherapy and microdermabrasion, botulinum toxin type A, hyaluronic acid, and collagen injections, cosmetic surgery, plastic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, dental surgery; cosmetic skin and hair care services, namely, chemical peels, acne treatments, microdermabrasion treatments, botulinum toxin type A, hyaluronic acid, and collagen injections, laser procedures for the removal of wrinkles, capillaries, red spots, brown spots, age spots, spider veins, facial and body hair, laser procedures for stimulating collagen production, evening skin tone and skin resurfacing; and rendering consultation and advisory services in connection with the aforesaid; beauty salon services; health spa services, namely, massage services and cosmetic body care services and; cosmetic medical and surgical services and medical services for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic surgery; cosmetic dentistry and consulting services relating to the same; providing information in the field of facial aesthetic and anti-obesity surgery, cosmetic surgery, plastic surgery, microdermabrasion, laser treatment, namely, sclerotherapy and hair removal, treatment of fatty deposits using ultrasound; medical diagnostic services, namely, providing ultrasound screening and diagnosis, measurement of skin and hair condition; medical services for skin treatment, namely dermatology clinic and skin health restoration medical procedures for physician- or nurse-practitioner-administered or directed exfoliation of skin and associated procedures for post-exfoliation treatment; hygienic and beauty services for skin, namely, treatment, health restoration, care therapy, timed application of gels, cleansers, lighteners, exfoliants, blenders, toners and creams; skin care salon; skin massage therapy; cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dentistry, plastic surgery, dental surgery; health spa services for body and skin treatments, namely, massages, applications of lotions and compositions including skin lighteners, skin masks, antioxidant treatments, skin peels, preoperative skin care, post-operative camouflage make-up, deep cleansing facial treatments, manicures, pedicures, face and body waxing, hair design, color, perms and full body massage, facials; beauty salon services for providing hair care, hair coloring, manicures, pedicures, and makeup; injection of medical injectables for cosmetic conditions and diseases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |