Drawing for MY FRIENDS TIGGER & POOH

USPTO serial 78807739

MY FRIENDS TIGGER & POOH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY FRIENDS TIGGER & POOH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy Kaufman

MARK E. MILLER OMELVENY & MYERS LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER28TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic shoes; bandanas; baseball caps; beach cover-ups; beachwear; belts; plastic baby bibs; bikinis; blazers; boots; bow ties; bras; caps; chaps; cloth bibs; coats; dresses; ear muffs; footwear; gloves; golf shirts; Halloween costumes; hats; head bands; head wear; hosiery; infantwear; jackets; jeans; jerseys; kerchiefs; leotards; leg warmers; mittens; neckties; night shirts; night gowns; pajamas; pants; panty hose; polo shirts; ponchos; rainwear; robes; sandals; scarves; shirts; shoes; skirts; shorts; slacks; slippers; sleepwear; socks; stockings; sweaters; sweat pants; sweat shirts; swimsuits; tank tops; tights; t-shirts; underwear; vests; wrist bandsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Mar 28, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 30, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance