USPTO serial 78808370
GEEK I.T. JUST GEEK IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787508Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, ROBERT JAMES
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEEK I.T. JUST GEEK IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Williamson III
THOMAS R. WILLIAMSON III WILLIAMSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, LLC1870 THE EXCHANGE, SUITE 100ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; COMPUTER DATA RECOVERY SERVICES; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Aug 26, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |