Drawing for ROUTE 66

USPTO serial 78813685

ROUTE 66

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROUTE 66?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Joseph Schaeff

B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP1 DAYTON AVE STE 1300DAYTON, OH 45402-6402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012recreational vehicles, namely travel trailers and fifth wheel travel trailersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 26, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance