USPTO serial 78815263
MODELS SELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODELS SELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon Blinkoff, Mark Harrison, Janet Satterthwaite, Marcia Auberger, Andrew Price, Michael Graif, Jacqueline E. Levasseur Patt AND Rebecca Liebowitz
SHARON BLINKOFF VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 34385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Outerwear, underwear and sleepwear for women, men, and children, namely, suits, dresses, trousers, jeans, shirts, skirts, blouses, tops, coats, overcoats, raincoats, parkas, jackets, vests; pullovers, jerseys, jumpers, sweaters, vests, overalls, pants, t-shirts, caps and sweatshirts, shorts, hosiery, socks and stockings, women's lingerie; knitwear, namely, knit shirts, knitted caps, knitted underwear; intimate apparel, namely, bras, underwear, undergarments, underclothes, pajamas, nightgowns, dressing gowns, robes, bras, body suits, unitards, swimwear, beach shirts, bathing caps; clothing accessories, namely, neckties, suspenders, belts, hats and hats, visors, caps, scarves, shawls, gloves, muffs; footwear and headwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 24/8 LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Models Prefer Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Models Prefer Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MODELS SELECT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |