Drawing for FINI

USPTO serial 78817865

FINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030SUGAR CONFECTIONERY, CHEWING GUM, CARAMELSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 18, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 18, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 16, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 15, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 25, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 19, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance