USPTO serial 78819591
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
In-Store Broadcasting Network, LLC
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by In-Store Broadcasting Network, LLC
IN-STORE BROADCASTING NETWORK, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by IN-STORE BROADCASTING NETWORK, LLC
IN-STORE BROADCASTING NETWORK, LLC
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by IN-STORE BROADCASTING NETWORK, LLC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Krieger
MICHAEL F. KRIEGER KIRTON & MCCONKIE1800 EAGLE GATE TOWER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information about statistics and analytical research methods, tools and technology to retail businesses including the provision of such information online | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |