Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78854489?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78854489. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CHEF'S DELIGHT?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78854489, the listed owner(s) include: Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc., Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78854489?

Serial number 78854489 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CHEF'S DELIGHT. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover CHEF'S DELIGHT?

The public record lists International Classes: 021. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: CHEF'S DELIGHT Serial# 78854489 | status 606; last event ASCK | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of CHEF'S DELIGHT?

CHEF'S DELIGHT (78854489) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEF'S DELIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT W. JOHNSTON

SCOTT W JOHNSTON MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-9944UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
021	Silicone bakeware	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 19, 2020	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 9, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Dec 2, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Nov 25, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
May 7, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2008	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Sep 4, 2007	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2007	ETOP	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED	—
Apr 4, 2007	ETOF	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	—
Mar 6, 2007	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jan 19, 2007	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jan 16, 2007	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jan 12, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jan 12, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 12, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jan 10, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 10, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 21, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 21, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 21, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 12, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 12, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 18, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Aug 7, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Apr 20, 2006	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Apr 11, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

CHEF'S DELIGHT