USPTO serial 78895774
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WorldWide Medical Products, Inc.
Brisol, PA
WorldWide Medical Products, Inc.
Hamilton, NJ
WorldWide Medical Products, Inc.
Hamilton, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christina E. Brule
Christina E. Brule Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C.5 Columbia CircleAlbany, NY 12203United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Test tubes for laboratory use; plastic test tubes for laboratory use; storage tubes for laboratory use; plastic storage tubes for laboratory use; centrifuge tubes for laboratory use; microcentrifuge tubes for laboratory use; pipette tips for laboratory use; laboratory kit consisting primarily of a rack for pipette tips, a cover for the rack, and pipette tips, all sold as a unit; laboratory consumables, namely, a pipette tip rack refill package consisting primarily of pipette tips in a container; laboratory equipment, namely-- plastic and rubber seals for plates, wherein each plate has wells for analyses of materials; plastic and rubber seals for plates, wherein each plate has wells for analyses of biological materials; plastic seals for plates, wherein each plate has wells for analyses of biological materials; aluminum foil seals for plates, wherein each plate has wells for analyses of biological materials; adhesive thermal seals for plates, wherein each plate has wells for analyses of biological materials; adhesive thermal seals for plates, wherein each plate has wells for analyses of biological materials, and wherein each seal consists primarily of a polyolefin film coated on one side with an acrylate adhesive; disposable latex gloves for laboratory use; protective work gloves for protection against laboratory accidents | ACTIVE | Jan 12, 2007 |
| 010 | Gloves for medical use; disposable gloves for medical use; disposable latex gloves for medical use; disposable gloves made of nitrile rubber for medical use | ACTIVE | Dec 27, 2006 |
| 021 | Gloves for use in the food service industry; disposable gloves for use in the food service industry; disposable plastic gloves for use in the food service industry; disposable vinyl gloves for use in the food service industry | ACTIVE | Jan 19, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |