Drawing for DICOM SERVICES GRID

USPTO serial 78904843

DICOM SERVICES GRID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DICOM SERVICES GRID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Provo

JOHN W PROVO MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN & BRAND LLP3300 WELLS FARGO CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software programs for transporting, storing, tracking and retrieving information in a network environmentACTIVEMay 1, 2005
035Information management services and technology consulting services provided to hospitals, physicians and other health care providersACTIVEMay 1, 2005
039Electronic archiving for others of medical imagesACTIVEMay 1, 2005
042Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider (ASP) in the field of health careACTIVEMay 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 7, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 7, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance